Motorsport Musings Ramblings of a racing enthusiast…

19Jul/106

Brands Hatch – Fencing Not Required

The Internet was awash with hundreds of motor racing fans gasping in amazement at the massive accident that happened at Brands Hatch yesterday. If you haven’t already seen it, prepare to be astounded by the following footage from Sunday’s SEAT Eurocup race.

Amazingly, not a single person was admitted to Brands Hatch’s medical centre following the accident. The only casualties were a rickety old fence and a trio of fold-out chairs which were quickly evacuated as Francisco Carvalho’s vehicle cartwheeled towards onlookers.

Thankfully the crowds at the Kent circuit had begun to thin out following the last WTCC race of the weekend, potentially averting a possible catastrophe. So what happens next?

Well anyone who has been to Brands Hatch recently will note that along the Cooper Straight they have erected some rather large, photographer unfriendly, catch fencing. Gone have the unrestricted views, with only Armco and wire fencing fending you away from straying onto the circuit.

These safety improvements don’t appear to have found their way along the Grand Prix section of the circuit yet, an area which typically doesn’t attract too many spectators given that it’s out in the relative wilderness. Remember also that this was the scene of Henry Surtees’ fatal accident (a year ago today in fact), with the wheel that caused the killer blow finding its way into a spectator area in this portion of the circuit.

It would be a great shame if a rare occurrence like the one we saw yesterday resulted in Brands Hatch being surrounded by high fencing, from what was really nothing more than a couple of dodgem drivers coming together.

It was an awful accident, but catch fencing in this instance probably would have made no difference what so ever, as the speed and momentum of the car as it travelled through the air would have carried it up and over any fencing anyway. It may have even worsened the situation, trapping the fleeing marshals.

If you watch the footage again, it appears that the posts supporting the Armco barriers may have caused a temporary ramp to appear, vaulting the car into the air – how else would the vehicle have become airborne from hitting a vertical barrier? Hopefully if track operators Motorsport Vision do conduct an investigation, they’ll look into better barrier maintenance and not install debris fencing as a consequence.

The beauty of the GP section at Brands Hatch is the lack of catch fencing as nearly all of the viewing areas are on the inside of the circuit. I sincerely hope there isn’t a knee jerk reaction to yesterday’s incident. I don’t need to be surrounded by cotton wool and be forced to stand a hundred yards away from the track, thanks very much.

We all know motor racing is dangerous, it says so on the ticket. So fingers-crossed that sense will prevail and they leave Brands Hatch alone.

Filed under: Other Leave a comment
Comments (6) Trackbacks (0)
  1. Very relieved to see no-one was injured or worse – especially after what happened at the same event last year.

    I think a contributory factor to the accident was how much drivers were able to cut the preceding corner because it has been so unusually dry. It was happened a lot in the WTCC races and the driver that triggered this crash cut the corner even more.

    But I think a high debris fence would have helped here and, as you suggest, perhaps the fact the Grand Prix loop is so seldom used (thanks to the wretched NIMBYs) is a reason why here isn’t one there already.

    I’d be surprised if there isn’t one there soon, particularly if their insurance company have seen this footage.

    • Corner cutting seems to be the norm’ nowadays in tin-top racing. Especially at the other circuits which have massive run off areas that almost encourage them to do so.

      Maybe it’s time the stewards were a lot stricter and started dishing out more penalties? The WTCC mob were issued with plenty of warnings this weekend following regular off-track excursions – something that should trickle down to the support events as well.

  2. I think another factor is that the Seat is shaped like a bloody Rugby ball – which is why it bounced so well!

    Glad that nobody got hurt – spooky that it happened almost a year to the day after Surtees’ accident…

  3. As a kentish lad, I’ve always loved the GP circuit at Brands (the indy being a bit to short) and hope this dosnt mark the beginning of the end of a great sections of road such as Westfield through Stirlings, as the circuit gets reshaped for safety.

    Also big respect to the marshal who nearly get wiped out and then is first to the car to check the driver – top man!!

  4. This week’s Motorsport News reports that an inquiry is well under way into last weekend’s incident at Brands Hatch.

    Could mean that the GP circuit becomes off limits to spectators because due to economical reasons, MSV won’t want to install debris fencing round the entire circuit. Especially the GP portion that only plays host to nine races per year.

  5. The wooden post which supports the barrier snapped. i assume this is what turned the armco into a ramp and launched the car, a freak accident perhaps, but i hindsight one waiting to happen and the fact there is no catch fencing perhaps doesnt help but it may have cleared that as well. Thank god there were no wheelchair users. or the like, in the area.


Leave a comment


No trackbacks yet.